On Nov 20, 1:20 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 20, 5:47 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > palsing: It takes two to communicate. Your "lack of understanding" > > is a failed ploy in support of the now disproved status quo physics. > > When are you going to list your non-existent contributions to > > science? Ha, ha, HA! ? NE ? > > It is difficult to discuss points of math with someone who has such > weak basic math skills. If you really think you can disprove status > quo physics, then get yourself published, otherwise you haven't a leg > to stand on.
You do not have to know how to do the mathematics of warped space to understand Riemann's geometry. This curving of space idea was all Einstein really needed to show it aligns perfectly with the physics of gravity.Ideas come before the math. Fact is Einstein could not do the math for GR. To sum it up would go like this "The curvature of spacetime embodies the gravitational force. Thus the opposite curve gives the pushing away of galaxies(my idea) TreBert
