On 22 Nov., 01:44, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 21, 4:41 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > There is nothing but a > > (potentially) infinite sequence of finite initial segments. > > The (potentially) infinite sequence of the last elements of the > finite initial segments *is* N.
That is your impression. Why is it not in a line? There are precisely as many lines as last elements, no?
> If you write the initial segments > on one line you get N on one line. If you write the initial > segments one per line, you get N on a diagonal.
That is not new. The question remains: Why this difference?
