
Re: Effect of gravitation in set theory
Posted:
Nov 22, 2011 1:30 PM


On Nov 22, 1:36 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote: > On 22 Nov., 18:24, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 1:15 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote: > > > > On 22 Nov., 13:45, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 22, 8:00 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > ... 40 is the smallest natural that is necessary to get > > > > > the sum 81. > > > > > 81=50+31. Must be some strange use of "necessary" that is only > > > > valid in Wolkenmuekenheim. > > > <snip evasion> > > > In Wolkenmuekenheim, "40 is necessary" does not mean that > > 40 has to be used. Strange place Wolkenmuekenheim. > > That is correct.
Well, WM acknowledges that he occupies a strange place (or are you having trouble with the antecedent of "that")

