On Nov 22, 5:12 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > On 22 Nov., 19:50, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 22, 1:20 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > > On 22 Nov., 13:58, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > WM: There are infinitely many lines. So we have infinitely many unions > > of > > WM: a finite initial segment and its predecessors. But infinitely > > many > > WM: unions are not an infinite union? > > > WH: No, of course not. > > So we need more than infinitely many many unions in order to have an > infinite union?
Im Wolkenmuekenheim when you say "infinitely many unions are not an infinite union" you mean "more than infinitely many many unions are a infinite union". Strange place Wolkenmuekenheim.
