my reply (to doctor Webb) was about language, not about your say-so proofs -- "I say, therefore it must be, So!..." anyway, M&M did not have a null result, as mentioned in the very first page of their paper, although this is never acknowledged by the Einsteinmaniacs, nor by the aetherists. also, the usual control in laser experiments is known, as the "reference beam," whihc is why they generally have a half-silvered beamsplitter.
(there are lots of simple books on this, although few of them will give the fact about the alleged "null.")
> I "disproved" SR when I > "showed" that the 1887 M-M experiment lacked a CONTROL, or unchanging, > light course. I also disproved SR by realizing quite early that NO > ENERGY EQUATION CAN BE EXPONENTIAL without violating the Law of the > Conservation of Energy-Mass!
