|
|
Re: Ariadne's thread
Posted:
Dec 16, 2011 9:49 AM
|
|
Franz,
Your modern analytical view point does not fit into the the EMLR, such as
1/8*(25/25) = 25/200 = (8 + 17)/200 = 1/25 + 17/200
with the scribal steps consisting of
17/200*(6/6) = 102/1200 = (80 + 16 + 6)/1200 = 1/15 + 1/75 + 1/200
with an out-of-order series indicated a 2-phase method
1/8 = 1/25 + 1/15 + 1/75 + 1/200 (line 8)
nor the RMP 31, and RMP 32 ... YOU SKIP OVER SCRIBAL DETAILS.
Where are your non-additive steps that directly explain the scribal use of 25/25 AND 6/6 that converted 1/8 in the EMLR
and RMP 31 that used 56/56 and 4/4 that converted 28/97 by solving 2/97 by 56/56 and 26/97 by 4/4?
Milo Gardner
http://emlr.blogspot.com/
|
|
