On 25 Dez., 20:51, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > A contradiction only comes into the play when the notion "set" is > > interpreted as it is in set-theory, in particular when the number of > > elements of that set is "proven" to be actually determined. > > One assumes it in mathematics, > And that assumption in mathematics does not lead to > any problems in mathematics, but does empower many useful solutions.
One assumes that the number of natural numbers is larger than all natural numbers. I prove that all natural numbers are in FISONs. That means the number of natural numbers is not larger than all natural numbers - unless one accepts that the natural numbers are distributed over more than one FISON. But that's only accepted by unmathematical matheologicians who try to misunderstand the notion of inclusion-monotony.
