On Jan 2, 5:21 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 2, 3:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 29 2011, 12:45 am, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 28, 6:27 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > ...In the > > > > parabola, y = x^2, when x increases finitely, y will APPROACH > > > > infinity. > > > > Well, that's what you are saying now... > > > > > Nowhere have I ever implied that infinity is ever reached or > > > > exceeded. > > > > Well, you not only implied it, you said it, as plain as day. I suggest > > > you go back in this very lengthy post to your statement made on > > > November 7th, where you clearly stated... > > > > > "...Then you don't know that y = x^2 has 'y' becoming infinite while the x is still finite." > > > > If you think that "becoming infinite" is the same thing as > > > "approaching infinity", well, you still have an awful lot to learn > > > about the concept. You clearly said that y becomes infinite while x > > > doesn't, and you were incorrect. > > > > Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you > > > realize you're wrong, does it... > > > > \Paul A > > > Dear palsing: You have NOTHING to offer science so you get hung-up on > > the semantics of what is infinite. Discuss science or I will declare > > you to be a persona non grata. You are already a persona non BRAIN. > > ? NE ? > > Well, you certainly aren't discussing science, why should I?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Palsing: How about these '+new posts'; its all about science, and is well-explained! ? NoEinstein ?
P. S.: palsing couldn't discuss science if his life depended on it. Ha, ha, HA!
