Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Deniers Mangle Basic Logic Even Worse Than Isolated or Scientific Facts
Replies: 50   Last Post: Jan 21, 2012 9:45 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 tunderbar Posts: 16 Registered: 2/6/11
Re: Deniers Mangle Basic Logic Even Worse Than Isolated or Scientific Facts
Posted: Jan 19, 2012 4:37 PM

On Jan 18, 4:23 pm, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > The guy who signs his monicker, thusly, what can you tell us about the
> > > > > Topic heading?

>
> > > > > Can you tell us the Source and can you identify the Land Areas, or
> > > > > better yet, the Countries that are Cooling?

>
> > > > A few of the world's countries are in fact cooling due to
> > > > human-caused global warming. The vast majority of the world's
> > > > countries are warming, and at an unprecedented rate, from an
> > > > unprecedented cause (human activity).

>
> > > The most interesting thing about deniers isn't that they rely on bogus
> > > facts but that the facts they use contradict their conclusions.

>
> > > For example, if one third of the earth is cooling then the
> > > implications are,

>
> > > 1.   2/3rds of the surface is warming, possibly at a higher rate than
> > > the cooling of the other third.  The fact that deniers haven't (up
> > > until now) ever suggested that the cooling of the one third is much
> > > greater than the warming of the 2/3rds just shows they are too
> > > ignorant of middle school math to even argue in their own direction.

>
> > > 2.  the studies of tree rings in one region don't say anything about
> > > the _global_ climate.

>
> > > Bret Cahill
>
> > One guy is not all "deniers".
>
> 1.  "For example" means just that.
>
> 2.  Who said anything about "all?"
>
> The point is deniers mangle basic logic even worse than isolated or
> scientific facts.
>
> Bret Cahill

It's implied in the subject line of the OP.

And you presume to pontificate about logic. LOL.

Date Subject Author
1/13/12 BretCahill@peoplepc.com
1/13/12 Transition Zone
1/13/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/14/12 Frederick Williams
1/15/12 Transfer Principle
1/18/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/20/12 Errol
1/20/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/18/12 AGW Facts
1/18/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/14/12 BretCahill@peoplepc.com
1/18/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/18/12 Dawlish
1/21/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/13/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/13/12 bacle
1/21/12 Ala
1/13/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/13/12 bacle
1/18/12 tunderbar
1/18/12 Bret Cahill
1/18/12 Peter Webb
1/18/12 Bret Cahill
1/19/12 Peter Webb
1/19/12 Bret Cahill
1/19/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/19/12 Bret Cahill
1/19/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/20/12 Bret Cahill
1/20/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 Peter Webb
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 Peter Webb
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 Ala
1/19/12 tunderbar
1/20/12 AGW Facts
1/20/12 mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
1/21/12 alanmc95210@yahoo.com
1/21/12 R Kym Horsell
1/21/12 alanmc95210@yahoo.com
1/21/12 Bret Cahill
1/21/12 bw
1/21/12 R Kym Horsell
1/21/12 Ala