On Jan 19, 7:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jan 17, 8:46 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > anyway, if you believe in "black holes," > > you are officailly an Einsteiniac, believeing that > > gravity is th sole force that acts > > over long distances ... even though, > > there is no accepted theory of this force per se. > > > and, no-one in these groups will question it, > > either, that I've noticed; so, > > you are in that (good or bad) company. > > > thus: > > yeah, the *causes* of increased CO2 are the true problem, > > viz deforestation as you mention, making > > for most effects upon the #1 glass house gas, H2O. but, > > inasmuch as the CO2 does increase the differentials > > of the weather, from the equator to the poles, no, > > it is not "entirely beneficial." > > > anyway, the spectrun of water vaopr is *much* larger. > > > > Realistic CO2 absorption spectrum is here: > > >http://members.casema.nl/errenwijlens/co2/angstrom1900/index.html > > 1tree: I am the one who has DISPROVED that Black Holes have gravity. > Thus, I've disproved "super-massive" black holes. But plain black > holes are likely evaporating at the center of every galaxy. > Understand? Ha, ha, HA! ? NE ?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Correction: Since Black Holes are the most solid features in the Universe, I should have said sublimate instead of evaporate. Dry ice sublimates, it doesn't evaporate. ? NE ?
