Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: X, Y and Z Interferometer Update
Posted:
Feb 11, 2012 10:48 AM
|
|
On Feb 8, 9:55 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> exactly my "point;"
> you cannot derive such a simple law as Snell's law
> of refraction from your anti-mathematical,
> linguistically-challenged "theory of every God-am thing
> in Universe, except for electromagnetism etc. etc.
> ad vomitorium."
>
> true, light waves are always polarized, but
> exactly nothing can be said about that, if
> you know exactly nothing about poalrization and
> electromagnetism -- sheesh, what a fool: he,
> who believes that math is just manipulation
> of equations to "define laws as equations,"
> such as Newton's mere algebraization
> of Kepler's three orbital constraints,
> to give the so-called universal law of gravitation
> -- which he actually stole from Hooke.
>
>
>
> > Light is refracted because photons are polar
> > Whatever "Snell's Law? states,
> > varying ether flow and density will correctly explain it!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
No, 1tree: I simply don't have the time to go looking up the likely
errant work of others. If you would like for me to comment further on
your "Snell?s Law", please copy and past such in your next reply.
Remember, my New Science correctly explains the entire Universe!! ?
NoEinstein ?
|
|
|
|
