adamk
Posts:
1,492
Registered:
8/15/09
|
|
Re: Raemsch the Loser Bitch
Posted:
Feb 26, 2012 12:17 AM
|
|
> On Feb 25, 4:48 pm, xxein <xx...@att.net> wrote:
> > On Feb 25, 6:53 am, Joe Wisherman
> <joewisher...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Can General Relativity as geometry be just a
> classical limit or an
> > > effective field theory which can someday become
> like newtonian
> > > physics?
Can you stop pretending you know what you're talking about, stupid bitch?
> >
> > > That is, supposed just for sake of discussion,
That you're not an imbecile. Let's see how long we can maintain that assumption.
> experiments could
> > > someday be shown that gravity could be shielded.
Done. Meaningless, phony , pretend-depth. Now you can hide behind meaningless garbage, you stinking, worthless turd.
> Then gravity is not
> > > accurately modeled by geometry and we may be
> dealing with some kind of
> > > actual field or quantum version with something
> that is not spin 2 but
> > > higher spin that can produce extra degree of
> freedom? What spin should
> > > it be to produce gravity shielding for example?
This is not science nor mathematics, loser. Stop dropping big words you don't understand.
Loser.
> >
> > > If so, then General Relativity can be shown to be
> just an temporary
> > > thing based on certain symmetries for spin 2 and
> doesn't really
> > > describe the real world. Does anyone object to
> this? Or do you believe
> > > gravity is geometry forever and ever? Thanks.
You're for never and never. You have never been nor will you ever be anything.
Loser.
<snip big words thrown around incoherently by babbling pretentious buffoon.
> Me and Alia wish to represent America.
No one here wants anything from losers like you.
> God bless America...
>
How original!
Loser.
> Mitchell Raemsch
>
|
|
