Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
vtcapo
Posts:
99
Registered:
7/10/09
|
|
Re: Telepathy: the story of a synchronization, explained
Posted:
Feb 29, 2012 12:05 PM
|
|
On Feb 29, 5:52 am, grahamcoop...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:07:39 PM UTC+10, vtcapo wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 7:28 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 29, 6:25 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > So Graham is a con. Go figure? Tell me if I?ve made the correct
> > > > adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
> > > > truth?
>
> > > > <-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
> > > > Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
>
> > > > RT
>
> > > What is it you want? A gold star or a chest to wear it on?
>
> > > Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
> > > the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...
>
> > > resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
> > > testers and story telling!
>
> > > Herc
>
> > Graham to be honest, where are we going with this? Your tests will
> > prove nothing. A true psychic would never participate in these tests
> > because they have nothing to prove. They are already in the know.
>
> > Remote viewing is different. It relies on protocols and is more in
> > line with your methodology. Although psychics were recruited or should
> > I say asked to join in remote viewing the best of the best were not
> > interested. This was the case in the UK and I would suspect in the US
> > and USSR. Why, because doing the dirty work for the MIC is not
> > something they wanted recorded in the Aether.
>
> > And like I said, or should I say, what the psychic said, everything is
> > recorded, all your thoughts, words and deeds.
>
> > It?s bad Karma.
>
> > RT
> > PS If you get roughed up occasionally it goes with the territory.
> > Don?t take it personal. I never do. Just brush yourself off and move
> > on....
>
> What? GRAHAM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:07:39 PM UTC+10, vtcapo wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 7:28 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 29, 6:25 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > So Graham is a con. Go figure? Tell me if I?ve made the correct
> > > > adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
> > > > truth?
>
> > > > <-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
> > > > Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
>
> > > > RT
>
> > > What is it you want? A gold star or a chest to wear it on?
>
> > > Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
> > > the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...
>
> > > resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
> > > testers and story telling!
>
> > > Herc
>
> > Graham to be honest, where are we going with this? Your tests will
> > prove nothing. A true psychic would never participate in these tests
> > because they have nothing to prove. They are already in the know.
>
> > Remote viewing is different. It relies on protocols and is more in
> > line with your methodology. Although psychics were recruited or should
> > I say asked to join in remote viewing the best of the best were not
> > interested. This was the case in the UK and I would suspect in the US
> > and USSR. Why, because doing the dirty work for the MIC is not
> > something they wanted recorded in the Aether.
>
> > And like I said, or should I say, what the psychic said, everything is
> > recorded, all your thoughts, words and deeds.
>
> > It?s bad Karma.
>
> > RT
> > PS If you get roughed up occasionally it goes with the territory.
> > Don?t take it personal. I never do. Just brush yourself off and move
> > on....
>
> WHAT?
>
> GRAHAM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:07:39 PM UTC+10, vtcapo wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 7:28 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 29, 6:25 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > So Graham is a con. Go figure? Tell me if I?ve made the correct
> > > > adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
> > > > truth?
>
> > > > <-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
> > > > Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
>
> > > > RT
>
> > > What is it you want? A gold star or a chest to wear it on?
>
> > > Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
> > > the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...
>
> > > resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
> > > testers and story telling!
>
> > > Herc
>
> > Graham to be honest, where are we going with this? Your tests will
> > prove nothing. A true psychic would never participate in these tests
> > because they have nothing to prove. They are already in the know.
>
> > Remote viewing is different. It relies on protocols and is more in
> > line with your methodology. Although psychics were recruited or should
> > I say asked to join in remote viewing the best of the best were not
> > interested. This was the case in the UK and I would suspect in the US
> > and USSR. Why, because doing the dirty work for the MIC is not
> > something they wanted recorded in the Aether.
>
> > And like I said, or should I say, what the psychic said, everything is
> > recorded, all your thoughts, words and deeds.
>
> > It?s bad Karma.
>
> > RT
> > PS If you get roughed up occasionally it goes with the territory.
> > Don?t take it personal. I never do. Just brush yourself off and move
> > on....
>
> GRAHAM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:07:39 PM UTC+10, vtcapo wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 7:28 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 29, 6:25 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > So Graham is a con. Go figure? Tell me if I?ve made the correct
> > > > adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
> > > > truth?
>
> > > > <-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
> > > > Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
>
> > > > RT
>
> > > What is it you want? A gold star or a chest to wear it on?
>
> > > Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
> > > the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...
>
> > > resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
> > > testers and story telling!
>
> > > Herc
>
> > Graham to be honest, where are we going with this? Your tests will
> > prove nothing. A true psychic would never participate in these tests
> > because they have nothing to prove. They are already in the know.
>
> > Remote viewing is different. It relies on protocols and is more in
> > line with your methodology. Although psychics were recruited or should
> > I say asked to join in remote viewing the best of the best were not
> > interested. This was the case in the UK and I would suspect in the US
> > and USSR. Why, because doing the dirty work for the MIC is not
> > something they wanted recorded in the Aether.
>
> > And like I said, or should I say, what the psychic said, everything is
> > recorded, all your thoughts, words and deeds.
>
> > It?s bad Karma.
>
> > RT
> > PS If you get roughed up occasionally it goes with the territory.
> > Don?t take it personal. I never do. Just brush yourself off and move
> > on....
>
> GRAHAM CO
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:07:39 PM UTC+10, vtcapo wrote:
> > On Feb 28, 7:28 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 29, 6:25 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > So Graham is a con. Go figure? Tell me if I?ve made the correct
> > > > adjustments to his number line analogy? The centerline being the
> > > > truth?
>
> > > > <-Graham-More Bullshit-Bullshit-Skeptics-BJ-|-VT-Faith Based on
> > > > Experience-Atheism-Organized Religion-Blind Faith->
>
> > > > RT
>
> > > What is it you want? A gold star or a chest to wear it on?
>
> > > Notice how me trying to mediate between skeptics and believers with
> > > the goal of designing some experiments we can test online...
>
> > > resulted in denial and defamation based on the absence of volunteer
> > > testers and story telling!
>
> > > Herc
>
> > Graham to be honest, where are we going with this? Your tests will
> > prove nothing. A true psychic would never participate in these tests
> > because they have nothing to prove. They are already in the know.
>
> > Remote viewing is different. It relies on protocols and is more in
> > line with your methodology. Although psychics were recruited or should
> > I say asked to join in remote viewing the best of the best were not
> > interested. This was the case in the UK and I would suspect in the US
> > and USSR. Why, because doing the dirty work for the MIC is not
> > something they wanted recorded in the Aether.
>
> > And like I said, or should I say, what the psychic said, everything is
> > recorded, all your thoughts, words and deeds.
>
> > It?s bad Karma.
>
> > RT
> > PS If you get roughed up occasionally it goes with the territory.
> > Don?t take it personal. I never do. Just brush yourself off and move
> > on....
>
> oh don't you??
>
> get fucked you lying shit
YaaaWnnnn.........
RT
|
|
|
|
