|
|
Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Posted:
Mar 6, 2012 3:03 PM
|
|
On Mar 6, 9:59 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 8:13 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 5, 5:03 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 5, 1:57 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 4, 6:03 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 4, 6:48 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Mar 4, 3:31 pm, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 4, 1:50 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 4, 5:48 am, vtcapo <vtc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 10:58 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Its substance shares dimensionality of space. But it is unidrectional
> > > > > > > > > > or forward alone.
> > > > > > > > > > All dimensions have two directions. Time does not.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > > > > > > Sorry Mitchell but I would have to disagree. Paranormal experiences
> > > > > > > > > with a psychic I frequented in the early 70?s revealed to me that he
> > > > > > > > > would travel to the Akashic Record, that place where time, past,
> > > > > > > > > present and future all exist at the same time. One wrinkle in the
> > > > > > > > > fabric of time is that the future is probable, hence numerous possible
> > > > > > > > > futures.
>
> > > > > > > > > The poor or inconsistent results associated with psychic readings is
> > > > > > > > > due to the less gifted being unable to correlate the causes and
> > > > > > > > > effects, past and present to determine which probable future is most
> > > > > > > > > likely to result. According to him, everything is recorded. Every
> > > > > > > > > thought, word or deed is recorded in the Aether. He would travel inter-
> > > > > > > > > dimensionally to view these possible futures to make his
> > > > > > > > > prognostications.
>
> > > > > > > > > Now, if this is to woo woo for you to grasp I perfectly understand.
> > > > > > > > > However, let me just say that the above is based on someone who
> > > > > > > > > DEMONSTATED the truth of his explanation by making numerous extremely
> > > > > > > > > accurate predictions that ALL came true for over 40 years.
>
> > > > > > > > > What do you have to back up your accusation? Please don?t tell me you
> > > > > > > > > read it in a book?..
>
> > > > > > > > > RT
>
> > > > > > > > Order only goes forward....
>
> > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch
>
> > > > > > > So what you are suggesting is that time only moves forward.
>
> > > > > > Order only goes forward..
>
> > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch; the prize
>
> > > > > Brilliant! Who have you convinced, yourself?
>
> > > > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > Some people go backward.
>
> > > And some cannot think out of the box because they are confined within
> > > it.
>
> > > Did you always color within the lines?
>
> > > RT- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I will leave you with the crayons...
>
> Let?s see, what do we have? Time?
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
> Its substance shares dimensionality of space. But it is unidrectional
> or forward alone.
> All dimensions have two directions. Time does not.
>
> Daryl McCullough
> Time has two directions: the past, and the future.
>
> Time is a *theoretical* construct. That theoretical construct has two
> directions.
>
> Frederick Williams
> What evidence is there that there is a future? The evidence that
> there
> is a past is not very convincing.
>
> KBH
> The fourth dimension is a coordinate system identification or
> coordinate system ID .
>
> Alfonso
> Time and space are inter-related by ?definition and not due to some
> inherent property of nature. As Essen ?says it is possible to make
> such a system of units work but it does not ?constitute a "theory" and
> serves no useful purpose.
>
> Uwe Hayek.
> Besides, it is Minkowski himself that stated that time and space were
> merged. If he had had more knowledge about dimensional vectors, then
> he ?would have realized that this meant that time is not a separate
> dimension.
>
> Yousuf Khan
> That doesn't preclude it from being a dimension, it just means its an
> uni-directional dimension.
>
> Micky
> But if time is a dimension and it only goes in one direction, then not
> all dimensions have two directions.
>
> Mitchell Raemsch
> There is only a universal Now everywhere since the absolute beginning
> of time...
>
> To be honest, Mitchell's last statement is correct for those of us
> confined to the physical word. But speaking from experience, this
> does not answer the fact that in the Astral, time does NOT exist, only
> the impressions it leaves behind in the physical.
>
> Therefore the questions one should be asking are:
> 1. Where or what is the Astral dimension?
> 2. What is the Akasha or Akashic Record?
> 3. What is the mechanism that allows a psychic to travel out of body
> to access this record?
> 4. Why is Israel using the Bible Code to ascertain probable futures?
>
> To truly understand Time you should be asking the Israelis who are
> working with the Bible Code. They know that past, present and all
> futures as well as the prospects of all future events are accessible
> via the Akasha. The Bible Code being a matrix that allows you to read
> it.
>
> But then again, if you are confined to the box you will never asks
> these questions. An understanding of Time is beyond our current
> physics and textbook theories.
>
> RT
> PS Mitchell, I put away my crayons a long time ago.
Its time to go back to the drawing board.
Mitchell Raemsch
> I think it?s about
> time you put yours away or pass them on to your children. Hopefully
> you will tell them that it is not necessary to color within the lines?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
|
