|
|
Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Posted:
Mar 7, 2012 10:29 AM
|
|
I meant, whensville; there is no where, there (that is to say, in Minkowski's silly sloganeering about mere phase-space, the one that is reconditely handled by Lanczos via quaternions, per Hamilton, in his _Variational Mechanics_; their .-)
> "momentum" already has units of time; so, > theresville.
|
|