quasi wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:27:30 +1100, "DavidW" <firstname.lastname@example.org> > wrote: > >> You claim to have a _complete_ set of natural numbers but by >> definition it cannot be complete. > > What definition are you referring to?
Don't you speak about the "set of natural numbers"? 1,2,3,4,5....
>> They go on forever! > > Yes, so what?
So you can't have a container for them. You cannot carry around a metaphorical bottle of the natural numbers.
>> That is the essence of my argument. > > You think you've proved something?