Curlytop wrote: > DavidW set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time continuum: > >> I would now like to welcome viewers at alt.usage.english to this >> discussion. Good day to you all. We would like a who/whom ruling on the >> 'whom' in the following sentence, if that is not too much trouble: >> >> Sentence: >> 'Who is this "you" whom some believe can contain an infinite number of >> what exactly?' >> >> To ensure that the whole sentence is clear, it was written in reply to >> this post: > > I'm an occasional poster to sci.math too. I must say the sentence looks OK > to me with correct usage of who and whom. But don't get me started here by > regurgitating any Cantorist speculations, I'm very much on the opposite > side (Decani? [1]), firmly believing in the One And Only (Unsigned) > Infinity. > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decani
I'd be interested to read the arguments [2], but your URL points to an unrelated topic.
[2] But not in a Usenet discussion, because it's a topic that easily attracts crackpots, and my past experience says that crackpots are easily drawn to sci.math.
-- Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. http://www.pmoylan.org For an e-mail address, see my web page.
