On Mar 12, 9:13 am, Transfer Principle <david.l.wal...@lausd.net> wrote: > On Mar 12, 6:59 am, Frederick Williams <freddywilli...@btinternet.com> > wrote: > > > FredJeffries wrote: > > > On Mar 9, 11:12 pm, Transfer Principle <david.l.wal...@lausd.net> > > > wrote: > > > > What legitimate finitists? > > > John Mayberry > > I once attended lectures by this man on the con(ZF) -> con(ZFC), con(ZF) > > -> con(ZF + GCH) results. He expressed no misgivings about omega the > > set. > > And so, I wonder in what sense is Mayberry really a "finitist"?
Obviously not by your criterion of an inflexible, dogmatic belief which damns anyone who disagrees, but see: