On 14/03/2012 06:01, Transfer Principle wrote: > On Mar 13, 6:12 am, Daryl McCullough<stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> On Monday, March 12, 2012 5:47:49 PM UTC-4, DavidW wrote: >>> No. You start giving me real numbers and for each one >>> I'll give you an integer. We can keep doing that for as >>> long as you like and I will never run out of >>> integers. Now you'll probably say that you didn't really >>> mean "larger" after all and want to bring up bijections >>> and cardinality and such like. Save it. >> Right. Ignore anything that shows that you're wrong, >> and only pay attention to arguments that agree with >> your conclusion. That's called dishonesty. > > Yet the ZFC users do this all the time. They ignore anything > that shows that they're wrong -- including proofs in NFU, > finitism, and other theories -- and only pay attention to > arguments that agree with the ZFC conclusion.
You know that this is false, since counterexamples have been pointed out to you on numerous previous occasions. Why do you keep posting this stupid lie?