|
|
Re: Bharatiya Predated Newton Calculus "Discovery" By 250 Years
Posted:
Mar 25, 2012 4:23 AM
|
|
On Mar 25, 6:26 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 1:48 pm, use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr.
>
>
>
>
>
> Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> > In article <d9ef0472-5081-4723-aeb9-6c3b40a29...@ms3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > On Mar 24, 9:47=A0pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mar 24, 6:33=A0pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > > > > > In article <3ef021d9-28ef-441a-8152-ed177a839...@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > =A0Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:40=3DA0pm, Peter Hill <peter.usen...@nospam.demon.co.uk>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:48:50 +1300, Ken Pledger
>
> > > > > > > > <ken.pled...@vuw.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > > > > > > > >> .... A little-known school of
> > > > > > > > >> scholars in southwest India discovered one of the
> > > > > > > > >> founding principles of modern mathematics hundreds of
> > > > > > > > >> years before Newton according to new research....
>
> > > > > > > > > =3DA0 This is not new research. =3DA0Kim Plofker, "Mathematics =
> > > in India", 2009,
> > > > > > > > >is an excellent general history of Indian mathematics, and inclu=
> > > des a
> > > > > > > > >careful discussion of the Kerala school. =3DA0 She gives numerou=
> > > s referemc=3D
> > > > > > > es
> > > > > > > > >to earlier work.
>
> > > > > > > > > =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0Ken Pledger.
>
> > > > > > > > It doesn't matter that they discovered it,
>
> > > > > > > It matters to the locals.
>
> > > > > > > > they failed to pass it
> > > > > > > > forward into the body of human knowledge.
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Peter Hill
>
> > > > > > > Then how do we know they did it first? =A0That knowledge was locali=
> > > sed,
> > > > > > > as opposed to globalised.
>
> > > > > > True. Of course a lot of our texts were destroyed, stolen
> > > > > > or suppressed by foreign invaders and occupiers for
> > > > > > centuries. Also, our sage-scientists protected knowledge
> > > > > > from the invaders by "hiding" it in devotional verses
> > > > > > used in prayers, knowing that the Muslim and Christian
> > > > > > occupiers would not recite them. These verses have been
> > > > > > passed down the generations to us.
>
> > > > > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > > > > Om Shanti
>
> > > > > The anti-Hindus had to be better at Sanskrit than the Hindu brahmins
> > > > > (after learning all from them) in order to interpolate the texts.
> > > > > That they could not do, they never could produce such a genius.
>
> > > > Then their efforts to get treacherous brahmins to do the dirty jobs
> > > > could not go too well, just see the pathetic efforts of our
> > > > "sanskritic" :-) :-) heh-heh goons/baboons.
> > > > The treacherous are also cretinous, so their undoubted capacity for
> > > > slander and vile abuse cannot be mistaken for talent.
>
> > > (minor alterations above).
>
> > > Thus the power of the Sanskrit language - its sheer greatness makes
> > > its literature proof to tampering, and hands down the thoughts of the
> > > sages, and the
> > > experiences of the priests and kings down accurately from time
> > > immemorial. A keen student can find out what was really meant by the
> > > great writers of
> > > the past - not all the efforts of the traitors and quotays and foreign
> > > ranters can dilute a whit of it all. Bad philosophers may opine,
> > > priests may fool the
> > > masses in temples, kings may convert to other faiths. But so long as
> > > the language and the literature remains, the past will remain cool and
> > > crystal clear
> > > to the pure student, seeking blessings directly from the Divine, for
> > > his own illumination. Lazy people will follow the corrupt leaders and
> > > their
> > > lying scholarship, but truth is beyond the scope of such perverted
> > > democracy. The ironic voice of the Goddess Saraswati cannot be
> > > submerged by the
> > > foul abuse of the ranting quotawallahs.
>
> > > Cheers,
> > > Arindam Banerjee
>
> > Saraswati Devi Kee Jai Ho!
>
> It is only to a few that this marvellous goddess gives the blessing to
> speak the Deva-bhasha the way She wants. No quotay, nor any absurd
> master
> of his, can hope to get such a blessing.
So, it is my great joy and pride to be thus blessed; and further, to
have shown it off on stage, saying the finest lines of Kalidasa under
superb direction to a
rapt audience...
>
>
>
>
> > Dhanyavaad for your comments.
>
> > Sanskrit is great! A previous post:
>
> > Sanskrit & Artificial Intelligence ? NASA
>
> > Knowledge Representation in Sanskrit and Artificial
> > Intelligence
>
> > By Rick Briggs
> > Roacs, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California
>
> >http://www.vedicsciences.net/articles/sanskrit-nasa.html
>
> > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > Om Shanti
|
|
