Rotwang
Posts:
1,655
From:
Swansea
Registered:
7/26/06
|
|
Re: Warning to visitors to sci.math
Posted:
Mar 25, 2012 9:50 PM
|
|
On 25/03/2012 22:50, Transfer Principle wrote:
> On Mar 20, 5:20 am, "Jesse F. Hughes"<je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
>> Transfer Principle<david.l.wal...@lausd.net> writes:
>>> And many of them have probably never given any thought to ZFC --
>>> after all, they are finitists.
>> Funny, then, that the people we are talking about come in claiming that
>> ZFC is inconsistent or otherwise wrong. Including, of course, the OP in
>> this thread.
>
> Hmmm. Let's take a closer look at this thread.
>
> The OP of this thread reads as follows:
>
> "Just be careful, that's all. Any answers should be carefully checked
> with
> suitably qualified people who do not post here. The people here
> believe that you
> can contain an infinite number of items. They also believe that one
> infinity can
> be "larger" than another. They are not to be trusted."
>
> There's absolutely _no_ mention of ZFC, much less its inconsistency,
> anywhere in the OP.
Right.
> It's the ZFC users who impose ZFC on the OP
Is it? I suggest you take an even closer look at this thread, to see who
was the first poster to bring up ZFC. The answer may surprise you.
|
|
