|
|
Re: Bharatiya Predated Newton Calculus "Discovery" By 250 Years
Posted:
Mar 25, 2012 9:59 PM
|
|
On Mar 25, 7:23 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 6:26 pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 1:48 pm, use...@mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr.
>
> > Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> > > In article <d9ef0472-5081-4723-aeb9-6c3b40a29...@ms3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > On Mar 24, 9:47=A0pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mar 24, 6:33=A0pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > > > > > > In article <3ef021d9-28ef-441a-8152-ed177a839...@x5g2000pbl.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > > =A0Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 6:40=3DA0pm, Peter Hill <peter.usen...@nospam.demon.co.uk>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:48:50 +1300, Ken Pledger
>
> > > > > > > > > <ken.pled...@vuw.ac.nz> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > > > > > > > > >> .... A little-known school of
> > > > > > > > > >> scholars in southwest India discovered one of the
> > > > > > > > > >> founding principles of modern mathematics hundreds of
> > > > > > > > > >> years before Newton according to new research....
>
> > > > > > > > > > =3DA0 This is not new research. =3DA0Kim Plofker, "Mathematics =
> > > > in India", 2009,
> > > > > > > > > >is an excellent general history of Indian mathematics, and inclu=
> > > > des a
> > > > > > > > > >careful discussion of the Kerala school. =3DA0 She gives numerou=
> > > > s referemc=3D
> > > > > > > > es
> > > > > > > > > >to earlier work.
>
> > > > > > > > > > =3DA0 =3DA0 =3DA0Ken Pledger.
>
> > > > > > > > > It doesn't matter that they discovered it,
>
> > > > > > > > It matters to the locals.
>
> > > > > > > > > they failed to pass it
> > > > > > > > > forward into the body of human knowledge.
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Peter Hill
>
> > > > > > > > Then how do we know they did it first? =A0That knowledge was locali=
> > > > sed,
> > > > > > > > as opposed to globalised.
>
> > > > > > > True. Of course a lot of our texts were destroyed, stolen
> > > > > > > or suppressed by foreign invaders and occupiers for
> > > > > > > centuries. Also, our sage-scientists protected knowledge
> > > > > > > from the invaders by "hiding" it in devotional verses
> > > > > > > used in prayers, knowing that the Muslim and Christian
> > > > > > > occupiers would not recite them. These verses have been
> > > > > > > passed down the generations to us.
>
> > > > > > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > > > > > Om Shanti
>
> > > > > > The anti-Hindus had to be better at Sanskrit than the Hindu brahmins
> > > > > > (after learning all from them) in order to interpolate the texts.
> > > > > > That they could not do, they never could produce such a genius.
>
> > > > > Then their efforts to get treacherous brahmins to do the dirty jobs
> > > > > could not go too well, just see the pathetic efforts of our
> > > > > "sanskritic" :-) :-) heh-heh goons/baboons.
> > > > > The treacherous are also cretinous, so their undoubted capacity for
> > > > > slander and vile abuse cannot be mistaken for talent.
>
> > > > (minor alterations above).
>
> > > > Thus the power of the Sanskrit language - its sheer greatness makes
> > > > its literature proof to tampering, and hands down the thoughts of the
> > > > sages, and the
> > > > experiences of the priests and kings down accurately from time
> > > > immemorial. A keen student can find out what was really meant by the
> > > > great writers of
> > > > the past - not all the efforts of the traitors and quotays and foreign
> > > > ranters can dilute a whit of it all. Bad philosophers may opine,
> > > > priests may fool the
> > > > masses in temples, kings may convert to other faiths. But so long as
> > > > the language and the literature remains, the past will remain cool and
> > > > crystal clear
> > > > to the pure student, seeking blessings directly from the Divine, for
> > > > his own illumination. Lazy people will follow the corrupt leaders and
> > > > their
> > > > lying scholarship, but truth is beyond the scope of such perverted
> > > > democracy. The ironic voice of the Goddess Saraswati cannot be
> > > > submerged by the
> > > > foul abuse of the ranting quotawallahs.
>
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Arindam Banerjee
>
> > > Saraswati Devi Kee Jai Ho!
>
> > It is only to a few that this marvellous goddess gives the blessing to
> > speak the Deva-bhasha the way She wants. No quotay, nor any absurd
> > master
> > of his, can hope to get such a blessing.
>
> So, it is my great joy and pride to be thus blessed; and further, to
> have shown it off on stage, saying the finest lines of Kalidasa under
> superb direction to a
> rapt audience...
Many years after that, people come to me and say how much they
appreciated it. It was really something, the power of the words, in a
gripping drama.
While it impacted so much upon the audience, the maximum impact was
upon me! No experience beats that, speaking properly in the language
of the gods.
It is not as if that something has to be repeated to make supreme
sense. Such is only for the dull, the fodder of propaganda of, for
and by the quotays.
> > > Dhanyavaad for your comments.
>
> > > Sanskrit is great! A previous post:
>
> > > Sanskrit & Artificial Intelligence ? NASA
>
> > > Knowledge Representation in Sanskrit and Artificial
> > > Intelligence
>
> > > By Rick Briggs
> > > Roacs, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, California
>
> > >http://www.vedicsciences.net/articles/sanskrit-nasa.html
>
> > > Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> > > Om Shanti
|
|
