quasi
Posts:
11,911
Registered:
7/15/05


Re: Factorization theory wrong? Or algorithmic error?
Posted:
Apr 6, 2012 4:59 PM


On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:49:49 +0100, CWatters <colin.watters@NOturnersoakSPAM.plus.com> wrote:
>For what it's worth a quick cut and paste produced.. > ><http://www.mathwarehouse.com/arithmetic/numbers/primenumber/primefactorizationcalculator.php> > >Results of Prime Factorization test >111956094361694734740061540900257528436988746514301060213050630976617907530060726713223042028923487695623178805395619821799868743856430058731438452818437316840959014392166803390411010978334873 >is not a prime number
Obviously the applet cannot correctly handle numbers that large.
quasi

