quasi
Posts:
9,078
Registered:
7/15/05
|
|
Re: Factorization theory wrong? Or algorithmic error?
Posted:
Apr 6, 2012 4:59 PM
|
|
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:49:49 +0100, CWatters
<colin.watters@NOturnersoakSPAM.plus.com> wrote:
>For what it's worth a quick cut and paste produced..
>
><http://www.mathwarehouse.com/arithmetic/numbers/prime-number/prime-factorization-calculator.php>
>
>Results of Prime Factorization test
>111956094361694734740061540900257528436988746514301060213050630976617907530060726713223042028923487695623178805395619821799868743856430058731438452818437316840959014392166803390411010978334873
>is not a prime number
Obviously the applet cannot correctly handle numbers that large.
quasi
|
|
