On May 5, 4:48 pm, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote: > The reason physics can't prove anything is because first of all, > technology is business and science is a game... The role of technology > is to jack a rod up the ass of science to show who is the boss. The > second reason physics can't prove anything is because there really > isn't any such thing as an unstable balance. Hyperbolic is a euphemism > for 'unsafe'... Safety supersedes truth always in the physics realm. > For all of the crap fed to us by physics, physics continues to get > funding based on its track record of safety. People like John Nash are > a great asset to physics (even though I do physics better than he > does) because he draws people who have game into having an interest in > physics.
I was watching a docu about imaginary numbers today, but I like physics because it seems to me its kinda like the common sense thinking, the engineering maths proving the imaginary math is an actually possible