|
|
Re: 0^0=1
Posted:
May 6, 2012 12:53 AM
|
|
On May 6, 12:06 am, Marshall <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, May 5, 2012 8:32:14 PM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote:
> > On May 5, 1:39 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > but also the personality trait you have
> > > of asserting your thoughts as better than other people's who are
> > > more advanced at the topic.
>
> > [...] To say only that 0^0=1
> > because 0^0 is equal to something called an "empty product" just isn't
> > very convincing to someone with a "middling level of understand
> > abstraction" (sic) such as myself.
>
> Sure. And a mature person, faced with something they didn't
> understand coming at them from a variety of sources with
> impeccable credentials would pause, consider, and try to
> understand what the people senior in understanding to him
> were saying.
I have no idea about anyone's credentials here. But I think I can
recognize a definition of simple convenience when I see it.
Dan
Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Also see video demo
|
|
