"LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote in message news:jp0d51$q7c$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> The relevance is that the anti-diagonal does not need anymore to differ > from itself, in what happens to be its omega-th digit (as the diagonal > here is the omega-th entry).
Sorry, I mean anti-diagonal in most places where I have said diagonal, my bad.
