LudovicoVan
Posts:
2,971
From:
London
Registered:
2/8/08
|
|
Re: On the diagonal argument again (2)
Posted:
May 20, 2012 4:28 PM
|
|
"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:55b27f39-f8f2-46e9-bdfb-b76135a5c5cd@b1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> I do not yet understand why should a diagonal s[y] that is not on the
> list have an ordinal y that eneumerates the entries of the list?
Yes, I guess I agree: "we cannot meaningfully substitute y for x".
-LV
|
|
