|
|
Re: Mathelogy S 011
Posted:
May 20, 2012 3:26 PM
|
|
On 20 Mai, 20:21, "dilettante" <n...@nonono.no> wrote: > Doron's sentence may or may not be serious, but it is a punchline whether he > knew it or not. It declares itself to be meaningless. > > "WM" <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message > > news:b02a9210-1c47-499b-865c-f6eaa131910f@e20g2000vbm.googlegroups.com... > On 20 Mai, 16:29, "dilettante" <n...@nonono.no> wrote: > > >> Still can't quite tell if you realize that the paper you linked to and > >> quoted, even though it touches on some interesting mathematics, was > >> intended > >> primarily as a joke. The sentence you quote, 'Apriori, every statement > >> that > >> starts "for every integer n" is completely meaningless' is the punch > >> line. > >You allude to Wittgenstein's view of set theory? For if one person can > >see it as a paradise of mathematicians, why should not another see it > >as a joke? [Ludwig Wittgenstein, Matheoogy 012] > >No, Doron's sentence is serious and true. Of course there are not > >*all* numbers. Ask anybody to tell you where these "all numbers" are. > >Ask anybody to name a natural number that would require more than > >10^100 bits. It's simply as impossible as to write numbers with more > >than 10 different digits on your pocket calculator. > > What does it mean for a natural number to "require N bits"?
A binary string that is not defined by a certain definition like "take a one and then three zeros" or "take the first ten digits of the binary expansion of 1/3" must be written with bits like 1000 or 0.010101010.
If there is no shorter definition is available, you need bits. If more than 10^100 bits are required, then the number has a due complexity. (Related information can be found under "Kolmogorov complexity.)
> Are there any > natural numbers that require more than 10000 bits? If so, what is the > smallest one?
There are natural numbers that require more than 100 bits. A comfortable way to find the smallest one, is to list all smaller ones. But it is tedious. Perhaps there are better means to answer your question.
A simple model is the pocket calculator. Check the smallest number that cannot be displayed.
Regards, WM
|
|