Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Recommendation for Physics Discussions
Replies: 8   Last Post: May 29, 2012 1:17 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mpc755@gmail.com

Posts: 1,279
Registered: 1/8/09
Re: Recommendation for Physics Discussions
Posted: May 26, 2012 4:09 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On May 26, 3:56 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 26, 6:29 am, LaLALa <lajourney...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > On May 25, 7:50 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
>
> > > This assumption is too narrow.  All laws of physics must apply to all
> > > frames of reference including what you call non-inertial ones, or else
> > > there is no physics.

>
> > And what if, Mr. Wublee, nature doesn't agree with you that it should
> > conform to such a rule?

>
> It can be assured that the best way to study nature is not to assume a
> very narrow band of operation.  The question to ask is that what if
> nature does not agree with LaLALa?s narrow scope of assumption?
> Generally, any narrow minded assumptions are always wrong.  <shrug>
>
> This is the case for SR.  By assuming the principle of relativity is
> valid over all, it creates a pile of garbage without addressing if
> that assumption is valid.  Except the Galilean transform that models
> light as classical particles, all other infinite numbers of transforms
> that satisfy the null results of the MMX invalidates the principle of
> relativity.  The Lorentz transform was fudged out of Larmor?s original
> transformation.  The Lorentz transform is not mathematically
> consistent.  Thus, assuming the validity in the principle of
> relativity is downright stupid.  <shrug>


MMX does not invalidate relativity.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity - Albert Einstein'
http://www.tu-harburg.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ...
disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
matter and the state of the ether in neighboring places is the state
of displacement of the aether.

The state of the aether connected to and neighboring the MMX is in the
same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation
about its axis and orbit of the Sun.

Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual
representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a
twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is
referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the
aether.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE

The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a
superfluid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to
determine if the superfluid consists of particles or not you would
still be able to detect the state of displacement of the superfluid.

The superfluid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is
in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the
superfluid.

The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same
state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about
its axis and orbit of the Sun.

The state of which as determined by its connections with the Earth and
the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of
displacement of the aether.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.