Complete nonsense and irrelevancy. I essentially said that it is not possible to meaningfully enforce federal anti-discrimination laws while using NO mathematics as part of the enforcement mix. Your "proof" of otherwise does not address what I said, and so by definition it is pure straw.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Louis Talman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Paul Tanner <email@example.com> wrote: >> >> >> This is not a problem since you are inventing a straw man. >> > > Interesting. The problem is based on a real incident. > > Is that a "straw man"? > > The question addresses how statistics are to be used, and does so---as most > problems designed for easy consideration do---in a simple context. > > Is that a "straw man"? > > You are rationalizing, again, Paul. > > --Louis A. Talman > Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences > Metropolitan State College of Denver > > <http://rowdy.mscd.edu/%7Etalmanl>