
Re: #34 Algebra Regents
Posted:
Jun 21, 2012 4:00 PM



At the time, however, there was significant discussion on this list serve and many people indicated that they called the state to ask about it and were told to take off 1 point for coordinates. I'm guessing this is why it was specifically addressed in the rubric this time. Liz
Elizabeth Waite AMTNYS VicePresident
Original Message From: CRANNELL, ELIZABETH A. <ECRANNEL@oswego.org> To: nyshsmath <nyshsmath@mathforum.org> Sent: Thu, Jun 21, 2012 11:06 am Subject: Re: #34 Algebra Regents
This question was on the June 2008 Regents... Here was the rubric then... 36) 3] The correct graph is drawn, and ?1 and 3 are found. 2] Appropriate work is shown, but one graphing error is made, but appropriate oots are identified. r 2] The graph of the parabola is drawn correctly, but no further correct work is hown. 1] Appropriate work is shown, but two or more graphing errors are made, but ppropriate roots are identified. r 1] Appropriate work is shown, but one conceptual error is made. r 1] ?1 and 3 are stated, but no work is shown. 0] ?1 or 3 is stated, but no work is shown. No where on there does it say a point has to be taken off for the roots written s coordinates. ****************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this mailing list, email the message "unsubscribe nyshsmath" to majordomo@mathforum.org
Read prior posts and download attachments from the web archives at http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=671 ******************************************************************

