On Jun 24, 4:54 am, djh <halitsk...@att.net> wrote: > Thanks very much for doing a1Xa3. > > I assume that in your second table, this: > > p0 p1 p1 p1 > > should have been this: > > p0 p1 p0 p1.
> [...] > You have the detail data for S63, S63R, and C711, so I know it would > be ?possible? for you to repeat all the analyses you?ve done so far of > ln(c/u) on ln(c/L), once using u <= 1 and once using u > 1.
Do you mean 0 < u <= 1 vs u > 1 , or u > 0 vs u > 1 ?