"LudovicoVan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > "William Hughes" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message > news:email@example.com... >> On Jul 8, 6:44 pm, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: >>> "William Hughes" <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:firstname.lastname@example.org... >>> <snip> >>> >>> > There is no step w (nothing happens at time 0). >>> >>> Not even that the vase is empty? Good grief. >> >> Certainly the vase is empty at time 0 and this is the first time >> at which it it empty, however, no balls enter or leave the vase >> at time 0 (it is a consequence of the existence of an ordered >> entity without largest element that you can have a process which >> is completed *by* a certain time, but for which there is no >> time at which a step that completes the process happens). > > It is rather a consequence of your ambiguous language that you are not > even wrong. Have you got any math to show?
Please show, in set-theoretical terms, that the vase ends up empty.