|
|
Re: Matheology § 062
Posted:
Jul 9, 2012 9:32 AM
|
|
On Jul 9, 10:03 am, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > "WM" <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message > > news:323539e2-9291-4825-8a6d-1ebbf868c090@b1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > On 9 Jul., 09:29, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > >> > > > 21 > >> > > > 2.1 > >> > > > 432.1 > >> > > > 43.21 > >> > > > 6543.21 > >> > > > 654.321 > >> > 87654.321 > >> > 8765.4321 > >> > 1098765.4321 > >> > 109876.54321 > >> > 1211109876.54321 > >> > 121110987.654321 > >> > 1413121110987.654321 > >> > 141312111098.7654321 > >> > 1615141312111098.7654321 > >> > 161514131211109.87654321 > >> > 1817161514131211109.87654321 > >> > 181716151413121110.987654321 > >> > 2019181716151413121110.987654321 > >> > 20191817161514131211.10987654321 > >> > ... > >> > Oll Klear now? > > >> > The sequence has the improper limit oo - in mathematics. > > >> as originally defined, only up through 8765.4321, subsequent terms were > >> sufficiently ambiguous to prohibit certainty of how to proceed. > > > A minimum of intelligence is required, of course. > > > Anybody else who cannot find the next line? > > Anybody else who does not see the difference between set theory and > > mathematics? > > To the last question, I for one still don't... but I'll try and go through > William's argument tonight (if I can manage). > > -LV
A simpler argument.
At time 0 there are no finitely-labeled balls in the vase. At no time is a non-finitely-labeled ball added to the vase.
|
|