"Virgil" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:virgil-34BE3D.firstname.lastname@example.org... > In article <email@example.com>, > "LudovicoVan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> "William Hughes" <email@example.com> wrote in message >> news:firstname.lastname@example.org... >> <snip> >> >> > A simpler argument. >> > >> > At time 0 there are no finitely-labeled balls in the vase. >> > At no time is a non-finitely-labeled ball added to the vase. >> >> This argument is simply bogus: of course non-finitely-labeled balls start >> entering the vase *before* the supertask is completed. I have hinted at >> this in my presentation of the number-theoretic solution (as opposed to >> the >> set-theoretic one: please correct my terminology if imprecise). > > Who is sneaking them in when no one is looking, and how, because the > only ones SEEN to enter the vase are numbered.
Yes, numbered, but non-standardly, given that this is a supertask. So the only sneaking, up to this point, would be on your side: but you are welcome to look at said number-theoretic presentation and ask or object there with some math.