In article <email@example.com>, "LudovicoVan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> "William Hughes" <email@example.com> wrote in message > news:firstname.lastname@example.org... > > On Jul 9, 3:38 pm, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote: > >> "William Hughes" <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote in message > >> news:email@example.com... > >> <snip> > >> > >> > A simpler argument. > >> > >> > At time 0 there are no finitely-labeled balls in the vase. > >> > At no time is a non-finitely-labeled ball added to the vase. > >> > >> This argument is simply bogus: of course non-finitely-labeled balls start > >> entering the vase *before* the supertask is completed. > > > > Balls only enter the vase at a step. At no step n in N > > (there are no other steps) does a non-finitely-labeled ball > > enter the vase. > > So you say by simple dogmatic stance (not an objection, not an observation). > I'll leave these unfruitful leaves alone, although I wish this noise could > be left out to begin with... Bye (speak later about your math, I hope). > > -LV >
We will wait with bated breath for you to explain how your alleged balls-not-labeled-with-any_natural-numbers get into that vase.
But until you can explain that to OUR satisfaction, you will remain wrong. --