Virgil
Posts:
4,483
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 062
Posted:
Jul 9, 2012 7:55 PM
|
|
In article <jtfgeg$eja$1@speranza.aioe.org>,
"LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:
> "William Hughes" <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:29443034-2198-4b72-92b9-47ea7bca39ea@m8g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jul 9, 3:38 pm, "LudovicoVan" <ju...@diegidio.name> wrote:
> >> "William Hughes" <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:85905a09-65c4-4d2b-8d90-9140b85d63b6@h9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> > A simpler argument.
> >>
> >> > At time 0 there are no finitely-labeled balls in the vase.
> >> > At no time is a non-finitely-labeled ball added to the vase.
> >>
> >> This argument is simply bogus: of course non-finitely-labeled balls start
> >> entering the vase *before* the supertask is completed.
> >
> > Balls only enter the vase at a step. At no step n in N
> > (there are no other steps) does a non-finitely-labeled ball
> > enter the vase.
>
> So you say by simple dogmatic stance (not an objection, not an observation).
> I'll leave these unfruitful leaves alone, although I wish this noise could
> be left out to begin with... Bye (speak later about your math, I hope).
>
> -LV
>
We will wait with bated breath for you to explain how your alleged
balls-not-labeled-with-any_natural-numbers get into that vase.
But until you can explain that to OUR satisfaction, you will remain
wrong.
--
|
|
