Virgil
Posts:
4,479
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 062
Posted:
Jul 9, 2012 8:58 PM
|
|
In article <jtftlb$ala$1@speranza.aioe.org>, "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:
> "LudovicoVan" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote in message > news:jtftcf$a23$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > "William Hughes" <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:abd1cfc8-e1de-4504-bd7f-bac8fa5efc7a@h9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > <snip> > > > >> Balls only enter the vase at a step > >> from the statement of the problem > >> > >> The only steps are n in N > >> from the statement of the problem > >> > >> At every step n in N, the only balls that > >> enter the vase are labeled 1+10(n-1) to 10n > >> from the statement of the problem > > > > The statement of the problem talks about an "infinite supply of balls", > > which justifies a broader approach in terms of ordinals (and the > > distinction balls vs. finite/non-finite labels). Anyway, I am not any > > good at arithmetic with ordinals, so here it is over N, i.e. your setting. > > Of course, the "structure" we get is not as reach as that given by > > ordinals and we can only conclude that the limit set is countably > > infinite. (My apologies for any trivial mistakes.) > > > > Let N be the set of balls (w.l.o.g. as each ball is uniquely labeled by a > > natural number here). > > > > Let n, m in N. > > > > Let V(n) be the vase at step n, defined by the rules of the game as: > > > > V(0) := { } > > V(n) := V(n-1) U { m | 10n-9 <= m <= 10n } \ { m | m = n } > > > > Let V(w) be the limit set (the vase at time 0), defined as: V(w) := > > U_{n<w}. > > Should read: V(w) := U_{n<w} V(n).
Still wrong, as it does not allow any removals at all, but every n in |N has a time before 0 at which it is removed.. --
|
|