Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology � 062
Posted:
Jul 10, 2012 4:03 AM
|
|
In article
<e73b53e4-53d5-4633-9ef0-56f24537b804@fi17g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 10 Jul., 04:24, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The set limit is
> >
> > V(w) = { n in N | there exists an m(n) with n in V_k for all k>=m(n) }
> > It is easy to see V(w) is the empty set.
>
> Fine. But in mathematics, we have quite another limit:
>
> >> > > > 21
> >> > > > 2.1
> >> > > > 432.1
> >> > > > 43.21
> >> > > > 6543.21
> >> > > > 654.321
> >> > 87654.321
> >> > 8765.4321
> >> > 1098765.4321
> >> > 109876.54321
> >> > 1211109876.54321
> >> > 121110987.654321
> >> > 1413121110987.654321
> >> > 141312111098.7654321
> >> > 1615141312111098.7654321
> >> > 161514131211109.87654321
> >> > 1817161514131211109.87654321
> >> > 181716151413121110.987654321
> >> > 2019181716151413121110.987654321
> >> > 20191817161514131211.10987654321
> ...
> --> oo and there are infinitely many digits left of the decimal point.
>
> Not interested to ponder about?
Since it is totally unrelated to the vase problem, whyever bother with
it now?
--
|
|
