Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Matheology S 062
Replies:
6
Last Post:
Jul 11, 2012 5:30 PM



Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology S 062
Posted:
Jul 11, 2012 4:06 PM


In article <bde4220925914ddab354cc075afbd5fb@m3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 11 Jul., 05:01, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > > > >>>>> Same with you. Answer the mathematical side of the problem, pleeze, if > > >>>>> you can: > > > > >>>>> 01 > > >>>>> 0.1 > > >>>>> 010.1 > > >>>>> 01.01 > > >>>>> 0101.01 > > >>>>> 010.101 > > >>>>> ... > > > > >>>>> Enough to see how it continues? > > >>> It is another thing entirely to relate that > > >>> back to the balls in urn problem, because he has very carefully > > >>> obliterated the connection, > > > > >> Here you can see the connection: > > > > >>>>>>>>> 21 > > >>>>>>>>> 2.1 > > >>>>>>>>> 432.1 > > >>>>>>>>> 43.21 > > >>>>>>>>> 6543.21 > > >>>>>>>>> 654.321 > > > > > > You'll be fired eventually. > > > > I'm sorry to say that I doubt it. > > That may depend on your ability to answer my question: Why are the > sequences above absolutely unrelated, incomparable and nonsense? They are unrelated to the problem that WM is trying to muzzle. 



