In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "LudovicoVan" <email@example.com> wrote:
> "Virgil" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message > news:virgil-3479E2.email@example.com... > > In article > > <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > > WM <email@example.com> wrote: > <snip> > > >> Infinity and infinity is infinity. Infinity minus infinity can be > >> infinity too. That's what Cantor missed: After each of infinitely many > >> numbers there are infinitely many numbers. > > > > After taking infinitely many naturals in their natual order there are no > > naturals left still to be taken. > > For every ball removed, 10 more get in... Your math is a fraud.
If you think there are any balls left in the vase at t = 0 then there must be a ball with the smallest number of those left in the vase, since the well-ordering of |N requires that every non-empty subset of |N has a first(smallest) number in it.
So unless you can name for us that smallest natural on a ball left in the vase at t = 0, you lose! --