In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 20 Jul., 16:30, Marshall <marshall.spi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, July 20, 2012 1:08:44 AM UTC-7, WM wrote: > > > On 19 Jul., 22:02, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > > Is there anything in that book that is unique to WM rather than being > > > > stuff that appears in almost all other math books at an introductory > > > > level? > > > > > Yes. The new view on infinity. The finity of the set of numbers and > > > the fact that this finity is not relevant for doing mathematics but > > > only to show set theory false. Further: What cannot be distinguished > > > cannot be a number. > > > > That's not new. Cranks have been saying things like that since forever. > > Cantor, for instance.