|
|
Re: Vindication of Goldbach's conjecture
Posted:
Aug 9, 2012 6:50 PM
|
|
On Aug 4, 8:44 am, lutt...@gmail.com wrote:
> Le mercredi 1 août 2012 06:35:42 UTC+2, Tim Little a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2012-07-20, lutt...@gmail.com <lutt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Indeed, a sum of two uneven integers, where at least one of its
>
> > > terms is not prime, can be transformed into a sum s of primes by
>
> > > adding some even integer n to one of its terms and subtracting the
>
> > > same n from its other term. Those who disagree could give an
>
> > > example where this method doesn?t apply.
>
> > Quoted for hilarity. Essentially he's saying, "Goldbach's Conjecture
>
> > is proved because you haven't given me a counterexample".
>
> > --
>
> > Tim
>
> Not exactly, remember what I wrote some time ago:
>
> " I am also almost certain that GC is true, but its validity is not
> proved.
> In order to demonstrate that it is false, one could show that a sum of
> two uneven but not prime numbers cannot be transformed into a sum of
> primes by adding and subtracting some even number to/from its terms.
> This doesn't seem to be possible, as the number of Goldbach's pairs
> increases with the magnitude of the sum (cf. Goldbach Comet), because of an
> underlying law.
> It is highly improbable that such law would cease to have effect from
> some particular number. Mathematical logic could even exclude it."
>
> Marcel Luttgens- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
A constructive suggestion:
Join the discussion groups at www.mersenneforum.org
You may find a more favorable reception there.
|
|
