On Aug 28, 4:01 pm, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote: > Pubkeybreaker wrote: > >Mike Terry wrote: > >>Pubkeybreaker wrote: > >>>>david wrote: >
> * Perpetual repetition of the same errors made in > previous queries and assertions, showing no attempt on > the part of the OP to understand the various pointers > and corrections received in prior replies. > > * Feigned humbleness and politeness hiding an ego which > allows the OP believe that he can crack FLT just by > fooling around with high school level algebraic > relationships, ignoring past recommendations that he > temporarily put his obsessive quest for FLT on hold, > and invest time in self-study of Elementary Number > Theory and Abstract Algebra, with an emphasis on the > developing the ability to read and write correct proofs. > > So while in my opinion Pubkeybreaker is often too harsh, in > this case he's right on target -- the OP is an idiot.
I would say that he is a classic example of Dunning & Kruger except for one thing: He is totally UNWILLING to learn. Being ignorant of mathematics is OK. Trying to do mathematics even though ignorant is also OK. What is not OK is a stubborn repeated refusal to accept what experts are telling him and to learn from his mistakes. He refuses to actually study this subject. Nor does he even make a feeble attempt to answer his own questions.