Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: ------- ------- ------- A Trigonomertic function
Replies: 15   Last Post: Aug 29, 2012 5:19 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 david Posts: 127 Registered: 8/3/08
Re: ------- ------- ------- A Trigonomertic function
Posted: Aug 28, 2012 8:22 PM

On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 4:01:42 PM UTC-4, quasi wrote:
> Pubkeybreaker wrote:
>

> >Mike Terry wrote:
>
> >>Pubkeybreaker wrote:
>
> >>>>david wrote:
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>Consider the following expression for the given conditions.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>R = [(sinwD)^2/w + (coswD)^2/w] (1)
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>w is an integer 5 < w < 41 and R is real > 0
>
> >>>>and 0 < D < pi/2
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>Assertion: 0 < R < 1
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>Any comment about the correctness of the assertion will be
>
> >>>>appreciated.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>A numerical example will be very helpful.
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>What happens when w is very very large compared to 41?
>
> >>>
>
> >>>Idiot. Don't you ever bother to check these ridiculous
>
> >>>questions yourself. Your assertion is trivially false.
>
> >>
>
> >>The assertion is correct - in fact 1/41 < R < 1/5.
>
> >>
>
> >>If w becomes very large, then R = 1/w becomes very small.
>
> >
>
> >I assumed that coswd^2/w meant [cos(wD)]^(2/w) and not
>
> >cos^2(wD)/w
>
>
>
> And what Pubkeybreaker assumed is almost certainly what
>
> the OP intended.
>
>
>
> Context: For many years, the OP has been trying for an
>
> elementary proof of FLT, using nothing more than his
>
> fragmentary knowledge of
>
>
>
> * high school level algebra and trigonometry
>
>
>
> * the simplest results of elementary number theory
>
>
>
> The OP's queries and assertions are typically flawed from
>
> the outset based on
>
>
>
> * Carelessly incorrect and/or ambiguous notation.
>
>
>
> * Unspecified (but needed) restrictions.
>
>
>
> * Meaningless over-restrictions having no bearing
>
> on the truth or falsity of the assertion, thus
>
> distracting from the essence of the issue.
>
>
>
> * An excess of free variables, allowing his claims to be
>
> easily defeated.
>
>
>
> * Perpetual repetition of the same errors made in
>
> previous queries and assertions, showing no attempt on
>
> the part of the OP to understand the various pointers
>
> and corrections received in prior replies.
>
>
>
> * Feigned humbleness and politeness hiding an ego which
>
> allows the OP believe that he can crack FLT just by
>
> fooling around with high school level algebraic
>
> relationships, ignoring past recommendations that he
>
> temporarily put his obsessive quest for FLT on hold,
>
> and invest time in self-study of Elementary Number
>
> Theory and Abstract Algebra, with an emphasis on the
>
> developing the ability to read and write correct proofs.
>
>
>
> So while in my opinion Pubkeybreaker is often too harsh, in
>
> this case he's right on target -- the OP is an idiot.
>
>
>
> quasi

Date Subject Author
8/28/12 david
8/28/12 Pubkeybreaker
8/28/12 Mike Terry
8/28/12 Pubkeybreaker
8/28/12 quasi
8/28/12 Pubkeybreaker
8/28/12 Mike Terry
8/29/12 quasi
8/29/12 quasi
8/29/12 Mike Terry
8/28/12 david
8/28/12 david
8/28/12 david
8/29/12 Virgil
8/29/12 Scott Berg
8/29/12 Deep Deb