On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Haim <email@example.com> wrote: > Paul A. Tanner, III Posted: Aug 31, 2012 9:25 AM > >>First, it's many times not speculation - there is a >>context and a history here, and that you put forth >>comments that are racist and echo white supremacy is >>well documented. > > The race card is played out. You can forget about intimidating me or anybody else with it. >
It's not meant to intimidate you. It's meant to inform the reader.
> >>Second, part of this context and history is that you >>refuse almost 100% of the time to answer direct >>questions directly - you almost always answer in an >>evasive way... > > By which I understand that you do not get the answers you like. >
Which proves the truth of what I said. And so you cannot expect any other type of response to your refusal to be straight with the reader.