On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Haim <email@example.com> wrote: > For another example, I talk about multiculturalism >
Actually, you don't. You talk about an undefined "multiculturalism" that you utterly refuse to define, since if you did try to define what you "talk about", then that attempt would expose the fraud that you are perpetuating.
addressed this undefined "use" of the term and how it results in completely getting it all wrong: I cited (with some links to book reviews and her video lectures) Amy Chua and her definitive analysis of how it is monoculturalism and not the "multiculturalism" of the conservatives that results in negative results for the society.
> How anybody, with a reading level above the 4th grade, can read tolerance into that bloody history >
And so we see some of the utterly wrong-headed analysis by Haim against multiculturalism: He blames"multiculturalism" for the violence when it is monoculturalism that is the root of the violence, where all this violence is always committed by monoculturalists, not multiculturalists. As I said in my post above:
"This garbage conservatives spew about the so-called evil of multiculturalism is nothing but excuse-making for the violence of monoculturalists. This nonsense by conservatives against multiculturalism says that these monoculturalists committing this violence have the excuse that says, "That evil multiculturalism made me do it!"