Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math.independent

Topic: Derivation of Ito Lemma
Replies: 12   Last Post: Feb 7, 2013 1:37 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Paul

Posts: 263
Registered: 2/23/10
Derivation of Ito Lemma
Posted: Sep 17, 2012 6:19 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I'm looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%C5%8D%27s_formula#Informal_derivation
where it says dB^2 tends to E(dB^2). I followed the link to the basic
properties for Wiener processes, but I can't find why dB^2 tends to
E(dB^2). I am guessing that it has to do with the limit as dt
approaches zero. The closest thing seems to be that the variance of a
Wiener process is t, but that's not quite the same thing. dB is a
sampling of a normal random variable, it is not a summary statistic.

For context, I am looking at the Ito Lemma for Geometric Brownian
motion (immediately above the Ito derivation link above). In the
second line, there is a -(1/2)(sigma^2)dt. This is a direct result of
the fact that the random variable dB^2 gets replaced by dt. It seems
to be a pivotal change, so I'd like to understand it.

Thanks.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.