The Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: David Ullrich on Godel
Replies: 19   Last Post: Oct 11, 2012 7:02 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Graham Cooper

Posts: 4,495
Registered: 5/20/10
Re: David Ullrich on Godel
Posted: Oct 9, 2012 6:22 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Oct 9, 7:24 pm, Jack Campin <bo...@purr.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Charlie-Boo <shymath...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 7, 12:01 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> David Ullrich used to append this quotation to his newsgroup postings:
> >> "Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
> >> That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."

>
> David was quoting a crank.  Somebody much like you two.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
> e  m  a  i  l    :    j  a  c  k   @   c  a  m  p  i  n   .   m  e   .   u  k



Is the following sentence true or false Jack?

Jack Campin cannot prove that this sentence is true.

We all know it's true! Do you?

Give your reasoning!

Herc



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.