
Re: If ZFC is a FORMAL THEORY ... then what is THEOREM 1 ?
Posted:
Oct 14, 2012 11:56 PM


On Oct 15, 1:15 pm, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote: > On Oct 14, 9:21 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ******** 10 YEARS DEBUGGING TO FIX THIS ********** > > How do you HAVE TIME to do this?? > You obviously don't know shit about theoremproving. > How can you be economically supported while working on this? > Or should we conclude from the sheer amateurishness of your efforts > that this was 10 years of your SPARE time, and that you have a real > job > doing some more concrete&applicable kind of programming??
I make $5K a week doubling every 12 months.
Hello Cam Affiliate,
Congratulations! You have earned commissions on referrals to CAMGIRLS.COM
Your commission is
TOTAL: $2515 20121007 Sun TOTAL: $1807 20121008 Mon TOTAL: $1902 20121009 Tue TOTAL: $2420 20121010 Wed TOTAL: $1598 20121011 Thu TOTAL: $2578 20121012 Fri TOTAL: $1984 20121013 Sat
7 DAY TOTAL: $14808 (35% = $5182)
************
George you are a SUBHUMAN MORON!
You are talking to GENESIS ADAM of KINGS BEACH QUEENSLAND
I only talked to you to get the derivation of !EXIST(RS)
because *I* posted it was a axiomless fact 12 MONTHS AGO
and I need it to STRATIFY OUT RS FROM *MY* PROVABLE SET THEORY.
A(S) xeS <> DERIVE( E(x) xeS )
*******************************
THE 1ST ABSOLUTE TRUTH! <<<<<<<<<< Graham Cooper grahamcoop...@gmail.com alt bible alt talk creationism alt atheism sci logic alt astrology Firstly, you have the unsupported assertion that there is something at the bottom of it all. Let's break LV's meta Philosophy into 2. Unsupported and unsupportable. To make a long story as short as possible:
May 6 by Graham Cooper  5 messages  3 authors
"The first ABSOLUTE TRUTH is actually the nonexistence of Russell's Set, i.e. a 'fundamental paradox that is founding the territory.' "
THANK YOU GEORGE for the AUTOMATED DERIVATION I WAS AFTER.
THAT IS ALL
Herc

