Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Replies: 26   Last Post: Oct 20, 2012 12:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
kirby urner

Posts: 1,673
Registered: 11/29/05
Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Posted: Oct 17, 2012 2:45 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (2.8 K)

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Joe Niederberger <niederberger@comcast.net
> wrote:

> Maybe "coffee.price" (coffee has a price) example will allow me to
> rephrase my original objection wit more clarity. "Dot" can signify any "to
> one" relationship in my opinion. Adding connotations like "contains" or
> "belongs to" or even "has" can be placed on particular uses of the dot, but
> dot in general is best left free of those.
>
> Joe N
>


I don't mind your wanting to keep "the dot" free of too much connotation in
itself.

You're like saying: don't let the OOP campers take total control of "dot"
connotations. I'm OK with that.

For us, the OOP campers, there's a hierarchy of containment, such that
"dot" obeys an algorithm.

"If I'm not in you, I'll search your parent, and if not in your parent,
I'll search your ancestors" -- there's a widening radius, a search pattern.

Lawyers might understand: "if you can't pay the debt, maybe your sponsor
can" and so on, up the line (looking for deep pockets).

The positive angle: you, the new object, are free to inherit most of your
functionality and just need to specialize in these few ways.

That's a power of this notation: to assume predecessors.

Again: STEM fluency is the issue. If you haven't been exposed to dot
notation, that means 12 years of high school with no dissection of an
in-your-face web browser. Madness. Means you're not aware of your
immediate environment. Means your school is a joke.

To put it more concretely, if you use a web browser and yet your school has
no courses that help you learn JavaScript, then stay home and learn for
real, as if your future depends on it.

If your school offers no help with learning say JavaScript, then I'd say:

"Your school is not really your friend, and is mainly day care for adults
(i.e. "the teachers"), you the victim, the guinea pigs.

If your school is really so lax as to be devoid of dot notation in general,
just don't go, fight instead"

-- that's my Silicon Forest mesage of the day (MOTD).

Paul should like my message as I'm not telling the misbehaving to mess with
his classroom experience. I'm advising them to stay home. No dot
notation? They're wasting your days. Join us. The cities have hungry
people. We are part of the solution.

Kirby


Date Subject Author
10/7/12
Read In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/13/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/15/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/13/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/16/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/16/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Paul A. Tanner III
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Paul A. Tanner III
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Louis Talman
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/18/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Louis Talman
10/18/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/18/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/17/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Robert Hansen
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner
10/19/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
Joe Niederberger
10/20/12
Read Re: In favor of teaching "dot notation"
kirby urner

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.